On this page
Most trend articles describe what designers admired last year, which is a poor predictor of what businesses will need next year. What follows is drawn from briefs — what clients asked for, what they rejected, and what they came back to change six months later.
The wordmark came back, quietly
For years the default request was a symbol: something that could stand alone as an app icon. Increasingly the brief asks for the name to be legible first, with the symbol as a companion rather than the lead. The reason is unglamorous — most small businesses are discovered in a search result, a map pin or a directory listing, and in all three the name is doing the work. A beautiful abstract mark next to a name nobody can read is a solved problem being solved twice.
Everything is now tested at 32 pixels first
The favicon, the map pin, the app icon, the profile picture. These used to be the last export. They are now, in practice, where a mark lives most of the time, and briefs increasingly say so. It changes the drawing: fewer elements, heavier weights, more contrast, and a deliberate simplified variant rather than a scaled-down primary.
Colour got more careful, not more conservative
- Dark mode moved from a nice-to-have to a stated requirement, which means a palette needs a second set of values rather than one.
- Contrast requirements are being asked about by clients, not just by us. Accessibility arrived in small business briefs this year in a way it had not before.
- The very pale, very tasteful palettes of the last few years are receding in categories where standing out on a shelf or a feed matters more than looking calm.
Sound became part of a brand for ordinary businesses
Not for everyone, but no longer only for large advertisers. If a business posts video regularly — and a great many small ones now do — a two-second audio signature attached to the logo sting is a real, cheap piece of brand equity. Two years ago this was a specialist request. Now it turns up on the motion desk from single-location businesses.
What did not change
Distinctiveness still beats prettiness, and it still loses arguments internally to whoever wants to look like the market leader. The most common regret we hear at redesign time is not "it was ugly", it is "it looked like everyone else and we stopped noticing". That has been the number one reason for a rebrand for fifteen years and this year did not move it.
Got a project this applies to?
Send two lines about the business and you get a plan, a timeline and one fixed price. If the honest answer is that you do not need us for it, we will say that instead.