$499 copyright certificateTrademark filing

Industry

Notes from the motion desk: what YouTube briefs ask for now

The motion desk is the newest team here and the busiest. What clients ask it for has changed more in two years than logo briefs have in ten.

7 minute read · published · updated

Logo briefs are remarkably stable. What people want from a mark now is close to what they wanted a decade ago. Video briefs are not stable at all, and the shape of what arrives on the motion desk has moved twice in two years.

Vertical stopped being an afterthought

Two years ago a vertical cut was something you asked for at the end, once the real edit was finished, and it was produced by cropping. Now a substantial share of briefs specify vertical as the primary format and the horizontal cut as the derivative. That is a different edit, not a different export: framing, pacing and where you can put text all change, and captions become part of the composition rather than an accessibility layer added afterwards.

Thumbnails became a design job with a test attached

A thumbnail used to be a still with a headline on it. Now clients arrive expecting three variants designed for comparison, and increasingly with data from the last set: this face angle held, that colour did not, text over five words never wins. It is the only part of the creative process most clients have real numbers for, and it makes for unusually good briefs.

Sound turned into a deliverable

  • Voice-over is asked for by name rather than assumed to be the client reading a script badly into a phone.
  • Noise cleanup on interview footage is now routine, and it is what rescues a shoot that happened in a real room.
  • Music licensing questions arrive before the edit rather than after a strike notice, which is progress.
  • Sound design on a four-second logo sting: a mark now often needs an audio signature, not just a moving one.

Where the money goes now

Two years agoMost of the budget in the edit, a little in graphics, sound as an afterthought.
NowEdit still leads, but graphics and thumbnails take a real share, and sound is a line item rather than a favour.
What got cheaperTranscription, subtitle timing, rough assembly and noise removal. The tooling genuinely improved and the prices moved with it.
What did notDeciding what to cut. The first ten seconds of a video is still the most expensive ten seconds to get right.

What we tell people to send

  1. 1The raw footage, not a pre-cut version. A rough cut removes options and rarely saves time.
  2. 2Where it is being published, and in what aspect ratio, before the edit starts.
  3. 3Two videos you think work, and one you think does not, with a sentence on each.
  4. 4The logo files. A moving mark drawn from a screenshot of a static one starts a step behind.

Got a project this applies to?

Send two lines about the business and you get a plan, a timeline and one fixed price. If the honest answer is that you do not need us for it, we will say that instead.

FAQs

Questions this raises

Animation runs to 72 hours for a logo sting. A full edit depends on footage volume, and the honest estimate comes after we have seen how much there is rather than before.

Yes, and it is worth saying which one is primary at the brief stage. Deciding afterwards means re-framing rather than re-exporting.

Try our online logo maker & custom design services now

Scalable branding solutions that maximise ROI, from a single logo to a complete identity system, priced for every budget.

Are you a designer?

Sell your custom-made logos and get paid for your time and effort. We're always looking for skilled, creative professionals to join our growing team.

Apply here